This comes at the cost of having a larger vehicle to move, and can be counterproductive, if the field is not of basic shape, and without obstacles. However, liquid fertilizer can be spread over a wider area, and can therefore allow you to fertilize your crops quicker. There appears to be no difference, in regards to the effect it has on the crops. Unfortunately, due to problems and bugs with the base game's content, Liquid Fertilizer does not provide any advantages over Solid Fertilizer, and actually has a few disadvantages - making Solid Fertilizer the preferred option.įertilizer Spreaders use solid fertilizer, while the Fertilizer Sprayer uses liquid fertilizer. Liquid Fertilizer is not a cheap option, but requires virtually no infrastructure and little equipment. I was able to sell the starting Kramer tractors (i kept one for sentimental reasons), the cultivator, and the sower, keeping equipment to a minimum.To quote the Farming Simulator Wiki, concerning Liquid Fertilizer Effectiveness and Economy seems to be pretty efficient while using a bunch of relatively cheap equipment. I basically just use this tractor, plus the starting harvester, and another SAME Argon3 hauling the starting tipper. The HORSCH cultivates as it seeds, and the Amazone ZZ-X fertilizes out the ass end as i'm seeding. I've gone a tiny bit further and hooked up the Amazone ZZ-X 1402 spreader to the back of the starting SAME Argon3 75 tractor, and put the HORSCH Express 3-point seed drill on the front of it. This is all mentioned above, but it jives with my experimenting as well. at least one of the spreaders (i have Amazone ZA-X 1402) can be front or rear mounted (super handy) sprayers / spreaders take different sources, but refill at the same spot (slurry is elsewhere right?) water / fertilizer both give yield bonus, seems to be the same bonus So just to sum up for everyone who gets to the bottom of the thread:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |